Why Johnny Can't Learn

We take the incredible technological advances thatspots or energy deposition in the brain may occur as a
have been made in the past 50 years for granted.consequence of internal reflections." In another study
Technology that was once a distant dream is now aconducted by leading neurosurgeon, Dr. Leif Salford
part of the fiber and fabric of our culture. A typicaland colleagues at Lund University in Sweden the data
American home is equipped with microwaves, cellindicated an "unambiguous link between microwave
phones, cordless phones, PDAs, computers, and aradiation emitted by GSM mobile phones (the most
wide assortment of technological gadgetry designed tocommon type worldwide) and brain damage in rats."
make life easier.There are hundreds of studies with correlative data
However, what price are we paying for theseindicating that this is far more than an
advances and, more importantly, what price are ouranti-establishment ploy concocted by paranoid
children paying for living in a world filled with thesebelievers who fear technology and little green men.
energy emitting devices?Just as the information on the dangers of tobacco
In spite of the occasional debate on safety, most of uswas hidden in plain sight, one need only scratch
have come to regard cellular phones as fairlybeneath the surface to find warnings about cell phone
harmless. After all, if cell phones were in any wayuse. Scientists have warned parents to exercise
hazardous to our health, we would know about it. Thecaution in providing cell phones to children younger than
sheer accessibility allays any potential fears about theireight years of age as there is little known about the
use. Cigarettes are also widely available but we noweffect of radiation on developing brains. Paul Brodeur, a
know without question that not only are they harmfulnoted science journalist, was one of the first in the
to the user but to those around the user as well.medical community to issue a public alert about the
However, widespread tobacco use went on fordangers of EMF. Brodeur warned that introducing your
hundreds of years before the connection between itbody to new forces such as EMF created a condition
and the fatalities it causes was made. Until then, theknown as "adaptation stress." In this condition the body
vast majority of people didn't consider cigarettes, pipes,is sent into chaos as it tries to adapt to the new
or any other form of tobacco use hazardous. Are weforces. Brodeur identified symptoms such as fatigue,
guilty of being lulled into a similarly false sense ofconfusion, lack of concentration and focus, headaches,
security about cell phones?backaches and increased emotional volatility. Is it a
The answer is an emphatic and resounding "Yes."coincidence that many of these symptoms which we
Before you dismiss that as an alarmist cry of anhave come to associate with and label as learning
anti-technology fringe of society, let's take a closerdisorders in children have increased dramatically over
look. Estimates indicate that we are exposed to 100the past decade?
million times more radiation per day than in ourIn another study, conducted by the Spanish Neuro
grandparents' generation. Electromagnetic Fields (EMF)Diagnostic Research Institute, it was found that a cell
are low levels of radiation which are generated byphone call lasting only two minutes not only opens the
electronic devices. Initial concerns about radiation wereblood-brain barrier (in children and adults) allowing toxins
dismissed because of low level of exposure. Weinto the blood stream which can attack brain cells, but
learned to live with microwaves because our homesin children that same two minute exposure could
were not filled with other devices. Yet, what is the riskdisrupt the natural electrical activity of their brain for up
now, when our homes are filled with electronic devices,to an hour following the call. So alarming was the data
our cars are powered by micro-computers, we arethat Dr. Gerald Hyland, mobile phone adviser to the
surrounded by power lines and cell towers, and weBritish Government, was quoted as saying "If I were a
spend hours a day with a portable phone held to ourparent I would now be extremely wary about allowing
ear?my children to use a mobile even for a very short
Cellular phones generate a field known as Radioperiod. My advice would be to avoid mobiles."
Frequency Radiation (RF). A number of studies haveThe cell phone industry is targeting the very profitable
concluded that RF from mobile phones poseschildren's market. Cell phone makers are marketing
significant health risk to users, including headaches,"Disney phones" and kid-friendly versions with parental
memory loss, autism, brain cancers, leukemia andcontrols. The industry is no longer content to have the
learning disorders. The Committee on Electromagneticadult and teen market, but in nationwide back-to-school
Energy/Public Health Issues stated in an Australiancampaigns, they aggressively market to tweens and
Government Discussion paper that : "Human exposureyounger.
of radio frequency radiation is greatest from mobileWe may not have all of the answers today, but the
phone handsets because of the method of use, withinformation we do have is alarming. How much more
the transmitting antenna of the mobile phone handsetevidence do we need before we take the dangers to
close to the head. There is evidence that localized hotour children seriously?